Artistic Dress

Transgressive Fashion in the Victorian Era

Artistic dress : Berg Fashion Library

'Mrs Luke Ionides' by William Blake Richmond, London, 1882. I've used this image throughout this blog as it is, for me, one of the best examples of Artistic Dress.

Much of my research deals with trying to clarify a definition for Artistic Dress, as it has been treated in vague and conflicting manners. I was interested to note that the Berg Fashion Library now has a brief definition for it, where it was not included in their recent ‘Companion to Fashion’ publication (rather, Aesthetic Dress was the main inclusion in this area). Berg’s concise definition isn’t too far from what I am trying to establish, although mine is of course crazy-PhD sized. But for the record, Berg states:

Artistic dress

Source: Berg Dictionary of Fashion History

(F, occasionally M)

Period: 1848–ca. 1900.

The influence of the pre-Raphaelite brotherhood, a group of painters founded in 1848 by Holman Hunt, Millais and Dante Gabriel Rossetti, on clothing was reflected later by Walter Crane: ‘…the dress of women in our own time may be seen to have been transformed for a while, and, though the pendulum of fashion swings to and fro, it does not much affect, except in small details, a distinct type of dress which has become associated with artistic people…’ (1894, Aglaia, p. 7). The ideal pre-Raphaelite woman had thick, softly curling hair, a pale complexion, strong features and a taste for unstructured garments in natural colours. This alternative style, one of the first successful movements antithetical to fashion, continued and evolved, and was caricatured and satirized, but the ideas of comfort and timeless elegance influenced designers such as Paul Poiret and Mariano Fortuny in the 20th century.

See Aesthetic dress, Delphos dress and Liberty & Co.

Artistic dress : Berg Fashion Library.

Advertisements

2 comments on “Artistic dress : Berg Fashion Library

  1. sphinxvictorian
    January 29, 2012

    I’m so glad that they call it “a successful” movement antithetical to fashion. So many things I’ve seen seem to treat it as an aberration that had no real effect on any subsequent generations. Whereas if you look at the Bloomsbury bunch, they were adapting 19th century artistic dress to their own gypsy and ethnic ideas. Also interesting is the effect that not only the Glasgow Boys and Girls’ art but the way they were dressing infiltrated the German art scene.

    • Robyne
      January 30, 2012

      That’s pretty much what I’ve said in my conclusion, though nothing new there!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 29, 2012 by in Artistic Dress and tagged , .

Header Image

'Mrs Luke Ionides' by William Blake Richmond, London, 1882. Oil on canvas. Collection of the V&A, Museum no. E.1062-2003. Purchased with the assistance of The Art Fund and the Friends of the V&A.

Goodreads

Twitterpated

%d bloggers like this: